Chapter 03

03 — Serial Monogamy & Babylon

This chapter argues that modern serial monogamy (church-blessed swapping, divorce-normalization, and romance-first religion) is not biblical faithfulness—it is Babylon’s definition of marriage wearing Christian vocabulary. Scripture frames covenant breaking as treachery and adultery, warns that believers can be disciplined “here and now,” and calls the gathering of believers to unity rather than division.
Dominant spine: romance ideology + system incentives Target: Christian men (ekklesia) Links: Blue Letter Bible (ESV)
Swapping culture

1) What this chapter means by “serial monogamy”

“Serial monogamy” is the social-religious pattern where marriage becomes a sequence of disposable contracts: divorce is normalized, remarriage is routine, and “dating culture” is treated as harmless—even among professing believers. The end result is a culture where households are fractured, children are divided, and covenant is redefined as temporary romance.

  • Not merely civil divorce: this is a culture that treats covenant as revocable by emotion.
  • Not merely “mistakes”: this becomes a system that trains men to accept division as normal.
  • Not “freedom”: Scripture repeatedly frames covenant treachery as sin with real consequences now.
Monogamy enforced in swap

2) Babylon is a system: intoxication, commerce, and moral confusion

Revelation depicts “Babylon” as a corrupt world-order that intoxicates nations and shapes desires. This series applies that metaphor to a specific Christian failure: men adopt the world’s romance-first definition of marriage while retaining Christian labels.

  • Intoxication language: the “wine” is a picture of desires and definitions that dull discernment.
  • System language: Babylon is not just “bad people”—it is a culture that trains behavior at scale.
  • Judgment language: God judges systems that corrupt covenant order and holiness.
Application boundary: this is not “woman-bashing.” The target is the system and the men who cooperate with it—especially those who claim Christ while building households with Babylon’s definitions.

3) The church is called to unity; modern practice trains men to accept division

Scripture treats unity as a covenant necessity. Division is not a neutral lifestyle option; it is a work of destruction. When Christian men normalize household division, the gathering becomes a body divided against itself.

  • “A house divided cannot stand” is not merely political—it is structural truth.
  • Christ’s prayer is unity patterned after divine order, not competing wills.
  • The body metaphor demands ordered cooperation, not fragmentation.
Covenant continuity

4) Romance-first ideology is not a harmless preference

A romance-first definition of marriage moves the “center” from covenant to emotion. When emotion becomes god, covenant becomes disposable. This is how men are trained to accept a revolving-door household culture while still calling it “Christian.”

  • Scripture calls for sober-mindedness, not intoxicated decision-making.
  • Desires must be governed, not enthroned.
  • Love in Scripture is covenant faithfulness and obedience, not just attraction.

5) “Grace” does not legalize treachery: consequence exists now

Modern teaching often implies: “Since I’m in Christ, there’s no consequence.” Scripture says believers can be disciplined, exposed, and made to reap what they sow in the present world—precisely because God treats sons as sons.

  • No condemnation is not “no discipline.”
  • Reaping is real and present.
  • God judges sexual sin even when people can quote Bible verses.
Plain statement: grace saves from final condemnation; it does not redefine righteousness or erase present-world consequence. A man can be forgiven and still lose his household, his testimony, his reward, and his future stability.

6) The modern “system” is upside down: incentives produce division

Scripture’s household ethic assumes ordered unity. Modern society often incentivizes the opposite: no-fault assumptions, court leverage, custody threats, and a cultural narrative that normalizes swapping. The result is the practical “beheading” of a household: the head is separated from his body, children are divided, and a new head is introduced.

  • Incentives matter: societies become what they reward and protect.
  • Division is normalized: what Scripture calls treachery is rebranded as “growth.”
  • Children are the proof: they bear the consequences of adult covenant disorder.
Note on “court-proof” framing: the point is not that courts are “the devil.” The point is that modern systems frequently treat covenant as disposable, and that social reward structures can invert biblical order. Scripture repeatedly warns that the world’s ways deform judgment.

7) Prophetic warning: do not drink the wine and call it holiness

The warning to Christian men is simple: do not be intoxicated by romance-first ideology, do not cooperate with covenant treachery, and do not build households according to Babylon while claiming to serve Christ. Scripture’s call is repentance, sobriety, and fear of God.

  • Come out of Babylon—leave its definitions behind.
  • Be sober-minded—do not let desire govern covenant.
  • Seek righteousness—because judgment begins with the household of faith.

8) Bridge: why Chapter 04 must go to Torah court

If covenant-breaking is real sin, and if systems can train mass confusion, then we must ask: How does God’s law treat treachery, false witness, adultery, and household consequences? The next chapter lays out “Torah court” to show that biblical justice is not sentimental—it is ordered, evidentiary, and serious.